Accès gratuit
Numéro
Ann. Fr. Med. Urgence
Volume 5, Numéro 6, Décembre 2015
Page(s) 283 - 289
Section Article Original / Original Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s13341-015-0593-9
Publié en ligne 7 décembre 2015
  • Claret PG, Bobbia X, Richard P, et al (2014) Surcharge du service des urgences: causes, conséquences et ébauches de solutions. Ann Fr Med Urg 4:96–105 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) (2008) Crowding (policy statement). http://www.acep.org/practres.aspx?id=29156 (Dernier accès le 15 août 2015) [Google Scholar]
  • Beltramini A, Debuc E, Pateron D, (2014) L’organisation des services d’urgences: un enjeu face à la surcharge. Ann Fr Med Urg 4:106–15 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ardagh MW, Wells JE, Cooper K, et al (2002) Effect of a rapid assessment clinic on the waiting time to be seen by a doctor and the time spent in the department, for patients presenting to an urban emergency department: a controlled prospective trial. N Z Med J 115:28–38 [Google Scholar]
  • Sanchez M, Smally AJ, Grant RJ, et al (2006) Effects of a fast-track area on emergency department performance. J Emerg Med 31:117–20 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rodi SW, Grau MV, Orsini CM, (2006) Evaluation of a fast track unit: alignment of resources and demand results in improved satisfaction and decreased length of stay for emergency department patients. Qual Manag Health Care 15:163–70 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • O’Brien D, Williams A, Blondell K, et al (2006) Impact of streaming “fast track” emergency department patients. Aust Health Rev 30:525–32 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Darrab AA, Fan J, Fernandes CM, et al (2006) How does fast track affect quality of care in the emergency department? Eur J Emerg Med 13:32–5 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nash K, Zachariah B, Nitschmann J, et al (2007) Evaluation of the fast track unit of a university emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 33:14–20 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kwa P, Blake D, (2008) Fast track: has it changed patient care in the emergency department? Emerg Med Australas 20:10–5 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ieraci S, Digiusto E, Sonntag P, et al (2008) Streaming by case complexity: evaluation of a model for emergency department fast track. Emerg Med Australas 20:241–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Copeland J, Gray A, (2015) A daytime fast track improves throughput in a single physician coverage emergency department. CJEM 17:648–55 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Considine J, Kropman M, Kelly E, et al (2008) Effect of emergency department fast track on emergency department length of stay: a case-control study. Emerg Med J 25:815–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Devkaran S, Parsons H, Van Dyke M, et al (2009) The impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: a Middle Eastern emergency department perspective. BMC Emerg Med 9:11 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Boddaert J, Cohen-Bitan J, Khiami F, et al (2014) Postoperative admission to a dedicated geriatric unit decreases mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture. PLoS One 9:e83795 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hausfater P, Sauvin G, Freund Y, et al (2013) Unscheduled return visits to emergency department: consequences for triage. Acad Emerg Med 20:33–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Taboulet P, Moreira V, Haas L, et al (2009) Triage with the French emergency nurses classification in hospital scale: reliability and validity. Eur J Emerg Med 16:61–7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Capuano F, Lot AS, Sagnes-Raffy C, et al (2015) Factors associated with the length of stay in emergency departments in France. Eur J Emerg Med 22:92–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guttmann A, Schull MJ, Vermeulen MJ, Stukel TA, (2011) Association between waiting times and short term mortality and hospital admission after departure from emergency department: population based cohort study from Ontario, Canada. BMJ 342:d2983 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Samu et Urgences de France. Communiqué de presse du 6 octobre 2013. http://www.samu-de-france.fr/documents/actus/129/767/cp_131006_sudf_aval_15_octobre.pdf (Dernier accès le 23 octobre 2015) [Google Scholar]
  • Bonnet P, Devilliers C, Saidi K, et al (2011) Impact de la seniorisation et du rappel des bonnes indications sur la prescription d’examens d’hémostase aux urgences pour adultes. Ann Fr Med Urg 1:163–9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Laker LF, Froehle CM, Lindsell CJ, Ward MJ, (2014) The flex track: Flexible partitioning between low- and high-acuity areas of an emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 64:591–603 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Simon HK, McLario D, Daily R, et al (1996) “Fast tracking” patients in an urban pediatric emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 14:242–4 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Doyle SL, Kingsnorth J, Guzzetta CE, et al (2012) Outcomes of implementing rapid triage in the pediatric emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 38:30–5 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCarthy ML, Ding R, Zeger SL, et al (2011) A randomized controlled trial of the effect of service delivery information on patient satisfaction in an emergency department fast track. Acad Emerge Med 18:674–85 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lutze M, Ross M, Chu M, et al (2014) Patient perceptions of emergency department fast track: a prospective pilot study comparing two models of care. Austral Emerg Nurs J 17:112–8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hwang CE, Lipman GS, Kane MK, (2015) Effect of an emergency department fast track on press-ganey patient satisfaction scores. Western J Emerg Med 36:34–8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ghanes K, Wargon M, Jemai Z, et al (2015) A comprehensive simulation modeling of an emergency department : A case study for simulation optimization of staffing levels. Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Press, pp. 1421-32. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7019996&searchWithin=%22Last%20Name%22:Wargon&newsearch=true (Dernier accès le 10 octobre 2015) [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.