Accès gratuit
Numéro
Ann. Fr. Med. Urgence
Volume 6, Numéro 6, Décembre 2016
Page(s) 410 - 414
Section Mise au point / Update
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s13341-016-0691-3
Publié en ligne 5 décembre 2016
  • Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (2015) L'AP-HP engage une stratégie globale d'amélioration des urgences | APHP. http://www.aphp.fr/contenu/lap-hp-engage-une-strategie-globale-damelioration-des-urgences (Dernier accès le 15 novembre 2016) [Google Scholar]
  • Guttmann A, Schull MJ, Vermeulen MJ, Stukel TA (2011) Association between waiting times and short term mortality and hospital admission after departure from emergency department: population based cohort study from Ontario, Canada. BMJ 342:d2983 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Casalino E, Bernot B, Bouchaud O, et al (2012) Twelve Months of Routine HIV Screening in 6 Emergency Departments in the Paris Area: Results from the ANRS URDEP study. PLoS ONE 7:e46437 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bingisser R, Cairns C, Christ M, et al (2012) Cardiac troponin: a critical review of the case for point-of-care testing in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 30:1639–49 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soremekun OA, Datner EM, Banh S, et al (2013) Utility of point-of-care testing in ED triage. Am J Emerg Med 31:291–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al (2016) Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315:762–74 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Freund Y, Delerme S, Goulet H, et al (2012) Serum lactate and procalcitonin measurements in emergency room for the diagnosis and risk-stratification of patients with suspected infection. Biomarker 17:590–6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kutz A, Hausfater P, Oppert M, et al (2016) Comparison between B·R·A·H·M·S PCT direct, a new sensitive point-of-care testing device for rapid quantification of procalcitonin in emergency department patients and established reference methods - a prospective multinational trial. Clin Chem Lab Med 54:577–84 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Asha SE, Chan AC, Walter E, et al (2013) Impact from point-of-care devices on emergency department patient processing times compared with central laboratory testing of blood samples: a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Emerg Med J 31:714–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Di Somma S, Zampini G, Vetrone F, et al (2014) Opinion paper on utility of point-of-care biomarkers in the emergency department pathways decision making. Clin Chem Lab Med 52:1401–7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jang JY, Shin SD, Lee EJ, et al (2013) Use of a comprehensive metabolic panel point-of-care test to reduce length of stay in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 61:145–51 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mogensen CB, Borch A, Brandslund I (2011) Point of care technology or standard laboratory service in an emergency department: is there a difference in time to action? A randomised trial. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19:49 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rooney KD, Schilling UM (2014) Point-of-care testing in the overcrowded emergency department–can it make a difference? Crit Care 18:692 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aldous SJ, Richards MA, Cullen L, et al (2012) A new improved accelerated diagnostic protocol safely identifies low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 19:510–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cullen L, Parsonage WA, Greenslade J, et al (2012) Comparison of early biomarker strategies with the Heart Foundation of Australia/Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand guidelines for risk stratification of emergency department patients with chest pain. Emerg Med Australas 24:595–603 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Diercks DB, Peacock WF 4th, Hollander JE, et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of a point-of-care troponin I assay for acute myocardial infarction within 3 hours after presentation in early presenters to the emergency department with chest pain. Am Heart J 163:74–80.e4 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fitzgerald P, Goodacre SW, Cross E, Dixon S (2011) Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care biomarker assessment for suspected myocardial infarction: the randomized assessment of treatment using panel assay of cardiac markers (RATPAC) trial. Acad Emerg Med 18:488–95 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goodacre SW, Bradburn M, Cross E, et al (2011) The Randomised assessment of treatment using panel assay of cardiac Mmarkers (RATPAC) trial: a randomised controlled trial of point-of-care cardiac markers in the emergency department. Heart 97:190–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Loten C, Attia J, Hullick C, et al (2010) Point of care troponin decreases time in the emergency department for patients with possible acute coronary syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Emerg Med J 27:194–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nørgaard B, Mogensen CB (2012) Blood sample tube transporting system versus point of care technology in an emergency department; effect on time from collection to reporting? A randomised trial. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 20:71 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sen B, Kesteven P, Avery P (2014) Comparison of D-dimer point of care test (POCT) against current laboratory test in patients with suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE) presenting to the emergency department (ED). J Clin Pathol 67:437–40 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) (2016) 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 37:267–315 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kemper D, Semjonow V, de Theije F, et al (2016) Analytical evaluation of a new point of care system for measuring cardiac troponin I. Clin Biochem http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.11.011 [in press] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.