Accès gratuit
Numéro
Ann. Fr. Med. Urgence
Volume 7, Numéro 3, Juin 2017
Page(s) 153 - 158
Section Article Original / Original Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s13341-017-0729-1
Publié en ligne 8 mars 2017
  • Campbell S (2008) Patient safety and continuous quality improvement – A user's guide. In: Croskerry P, Cosby KS, Schenkel SM, et al, Patient Safety in Emergency Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphie 12–22 [Google Scholar]
  • Sandhu H, Carpenter C, Freeman K, et al (2006) Clinical decision making: opening the black box of cognitive reasoning. Ann Emerg Med 48:713–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E, et al (2011) Comment les médecins raisonnent-ils pour poser des diagnostics et prendre des décisions thérapeutiques ? Les enjeux en médecine d'urgence. Ann Fr Médecine Urgence 1:77–84 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al (1991) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Croskerry P, Abbass AA, Wu AW (2008) How doctors feel: affective issues in patients’ safety. Lancet 372:1205–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al (1991) The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 324:377–84 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Graber M (2005) Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Jt Comm Resour 31:106–13 [Google Scholar]
  • Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R (2005) Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med 165:1493–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Croskerry P (2012) Perspectives on diagnostic failure and patient safety. Healthc Q Tor Ont 15(Spec No):50–6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Payne VL, Crowley RS (2008) Assessing use of cognitive heuristic representativeness in clinical reasoning. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:571–5 [Google Scholar]
  • Kachalia A, Gandhi TK, Puopolo AL, et al (2007) Missed and delayed diagnoses in the emergency department: a study of closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers. Ann Emerg Med 49:196–205 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Croskerry P, Sinclair D (2001) Emergency medicine: A practice prone to error? CJEM 3:271–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Croskerry P (2000) The cognitive imperative: thinking about how we think. Acad Emerg Med 7:1223–31 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E, et al (2014) How and when do expert emergency physicians generate and evaluate diagnostic hypotheses? A qualitative study using head-mounted video cued-recall interviews. Ann Emerg Med 64:575–85 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E, et al (2015) Insights into emergency physicians’ minds in the seconds before and into a patient encounter. Intern Emerg Med 10:865–73 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E, et al (2015) From context comes expertise: how do expert emergency physicians use their know-who to make decisions? Ann Emerg Med 67:747–51 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E, et al (2016) Do emergency physicians trust their patients? Intern Emerg Med 11:603–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Knoblauch H (2005) Focused ethnography. Forum Qual Soc Res 6:44 [Google Scholar]
  • Muecke MA (1994) On the evaluation of ethnographies. In: Morse JM, Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 187–209 [Google Scholar]
  • Unsworth CA (2004) Clinical reasoning: how do pragmatic reasoning, worldview and client-centredness fit? Br J Occup Ther 67:10–9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Omodei MM, McLennan J, Wearing AJ (2005) How expertise is applied in real-world dynamic environments: head-mounted video and cued recall as a methodology for studying routines of decision-making. In: Betsch T, Haberstroh S, The routines of decision-making. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 271–88 [Google Scholar]
  • Rix G, Biache MJ (2004) Enregistrement en perspective subjective située et entretien en re-situ subjectif: une méthodologie de la constitution de l'expérience. Intellectica 38:363–96 [Google Scholar]
  • Unsworth CA (2001) Using a head-mounted video camera to study clinical reasoning. Am J Occup Ther 55:582–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB (2005) Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med 142:260–73 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ericsson KA (2004) Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 79:S70–81 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Friedman Z, Siddiqui N, Katznelson R, et al (2008) Experience is not enough: repeated breaches in epidural anesthesia aseptic technique by novice operators despite improved skill. Anesthesiology 108:914–20 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guest CB, Regehr G, Tiberius RG (2001) The lifelong challenge of expertise. Med Educ 35:78–81 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moulton CE, Regehr G, Mylopoulos M, MacRae HM (2007) Slowing down when you should: a new model of expert judgment. Acad Med 82:S109–16 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1999) Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction, Piscataway, NJ [Google Scholar]
  • Green J (2009) Qualitative methods for health research, 3rd revised edition. SAGE Publications Ltd, Los Angeles [Google Scholar]
  • Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N (2000) Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 320:114–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Miles MB, Huberman M (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd revised edition. SAGE Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks [Google Scholar]
  • Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E, Charlin B (2011) An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach: the dual-process theory. Med Educ Online, 16 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hogarth RM (2010) Educating intuition. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago [Google Scholar]
  • Durning S, Artino AR, Pangaro L, et al (2011) Context and clinical reasoning: understanding the perspective of the expert's voice. Med Educ 45:927–38 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Croskerry P (2009) Context is everything or how could I have been that stupid? Healthc Q 12:e171–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Croskerry P, Cosby KS (2009) Patient safety in emergency medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia [Google Scholar]
  • Elstein AS, Schulman LS, Sprafka SA (1978) Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schwartz A, Elstein AS (2008) Clinical reasoning in medicine. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, et al, Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 223–34 [Google Scholar]
  • Norman G (2005) Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends. Med Educ 39:418–27 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gruppen LD, Frohna AZ (2002) Clinical reasoning. In: Norman GR, van der Vleuten CP, Newble DI, International handbook of research in medical education. Kluwer Academic, Boston, 205–30 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Woods NN (2007) Science is fundamental: the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Med Educ 41:1173–7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1993) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. A Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA [Google Scholar]
  • Britten N (1995) Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ 311:251–3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.