Accès gratuit
Numéro
Ann. Fr. Med. Urgence
Volume 9, Numéro 3, Mai 2019
Page(s) 197 - 199
Section Lettre à l’éditeur / Letter to the editor
DOI https://doi.org/10.3166/afmu-2019-0158
Publié en ligne 14 avril 2019
  • Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A (2018) The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle: 2018 update. Crit Care Med 46:997–1000 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al (2016) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 45:486–552 [Google Scholar]
  • Leisman DE, Doerfler ME, Ward MF, et al (2017) Survival benefit and cost savings from compliance with a simplified 3-hour sepsis bundle in a series of prospective, multisite, observational cohorts. Crit Care Med 45:395–406 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu VX, Morehouse JW, Marelich GP, et al (2016) Multicenter implementation of a treatment bundle for patients with sepsis and intermediate lactate values. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193:1264–70 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al (2017) Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med 376:2235–44 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Freund Y, Khoury A, Mockel M, et al (2019) European Society of Emergency Medicine position paper on the one-hour sepsis bundle of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign: expression of concern. Eur J Emerg Med (in press) [Google Scholar]
  • Mason S, Weber EJ, Coster J, et al (2012) Time patients spend in the emergency department: england’s 4-hour rule, a case of hitting the target but missing the point? Ann Emerg Med 59:341–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Locker TE, Mason SM (2005) Analysis of the distribution of time that patients spend in emergency departments. BMJ 330:1188–9 [Google Scholar]
  • Jones AE, Heffner AC, Horton JM, Marchick MR (2010) Etiology of Illness in patients with severe sepsis admitted to the hospital from the emergency department. Clin Infect Dis 50:814–20 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rhee C, Filbin MR, Massaro AF, et al (2018) Compliance with the national Sep-1 quality measure and association with sepsis outcomes: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Crit Care Med 46:1585–91 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Finfer S (2010) The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: robust evaluation and high-quality primary research is still needed. Intensive Care Med 36:187–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Antonelli M, Debacker D, Dorman T, et al (2019) Surviving sepsis campaign responds to Sepsis-3. http://www.survivingsepsis.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/SSC-Statements-Sepsis-Definitions-3-2016.pdf (Dernier accès le 14 mars 2019) [Google Scholar]
  • Gu WJ, Zhang Z, Bakker J (2015) Early lactate clearance-guided therapy in patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Intensive Care Med 41:1862–3 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lemachatti N, Ortega M, Penaloza A, et al (2019) Early variation of quick sequential organ failure assessment score to predict inhospital mortality in emergency department patients with suspected infection. Eur J Emerg Med (in press) [Google Scholar]
  • Lo R, Brabrand M, Kurland L, et al (2019) Sepsis, where are the emergency physicians? Eur J Emerg Med 23:159 [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.